I wouldn't call this a shit-test either.

Something was missing for her on the date.

Maybe you didn't smoothly move things along for her.

In my experience, it's not worth the effort once someone has made their mind up, AND they've already met you in person.

I had this recently from cold approach.

Good date, back my place, I didn't escalate because I thought there was a time constraint.

And this was on-on. Like she texted me when she got home, "Can't help but keep thinking about those kisses" type of thing.

Another date, I didn't move it along that nicely.

Boom, "I'm not feeling the chemistry".

You're done.

What's the thinking behind sending pretty low investment texts from your side, "Yo sexy" etc vs. something with a bit more "meat" to it for her to respond on for those once a week/once every 2 weeks messages?

This example really feels like you wasted no words, every word had a purpose.

Were you being a bit more "dominant" in the texting as well because she said that's what she liked e.g. "I need you to be more specific", "Update" etc, like really not including much bs.

Her: “Hey love. I’m feeling a little down
Me: “One of my famous massages will solve that"

If she wasn't as invested as she was, could our response be "too thirsty" or is it quite a typical response you'd send if we she had already agreed to come over (which I guess is pretty invested moved) and was not feeling well?

Is there a series of questions you're asking yourself before responding to a text?

I'm back at my parent's place for a bit between travel and accommodatio plans. In theory, I could, but I wouldn't feel comfortable, and thus the girl isn't likely either.

It seems I'm struggling to understand the frame because;

• if I give short and brief answers, I feel like I'm being dull (and potentially rude)
• when I try inject a bit of something into my lines they get a bit too gamey too quickly

I've attached a recent example of me trying to be more short, no gamey-ness. I just seems so dull. This girl and I do have a bit of interesting in that we haven't got to meet up yet but she was blowing up my phone massive in the past before she went away so I feel like I have the "buyer" frame in my court.

Right after she said "I like romance" i realized I could have and probably should have sexualized a bit more (in the past we've spoken about pretty sexual topics, dominant vs. submissive, what she likes, what i like etc).

None taken, honest feedback is what I need.

"Epic" is like my knee-jerk response because I feel I "need" to acknowledge something they said. Will aim to cut it out. Should I be cutting out even "Cool"s, "Ah okay"s, "Interesting" because I do those as well.

So I didn't say romantic patio because I can't pull to my place at the moment. How would you change the sequence in that case, "Your romantic patio"? If I recall correctly, one of your videos mentioned you don't want to make too many assumptions about her living situation.

And, does it still apply as double-texting if you're simply breaking up two separates responses? Does that mean you should essentially only ever respond to one thing even if there are multiple points to potentially respond to in their texts?

Appreciate the feedback everyone! Already seeing a change in the "vibe" of my interactions after my first changes.

V2

183cm | Cape Town | Traveling Entrepreneur and Consultant

• Great genes
• Dominant
• Great oral skills
• Competitive kickboxing
• World traveler of 20+ countries
• Dogs
• Expert cuddler
• No felonies
• Learning German
• Once locked eyes with Ryan Reynolds

WEAKNESSES: Nice booties, accents, and cute smiles

Saying "great" twice feels a bit off to me, but "Great oral skills" I think works nicely considering the work I do i.e. I do have to give presentations and speak to teams so it's ambiguous

Not consistently but I have competed i.e. there is a winner and a loser. You're thinking "Competitive Kickboxer" vs. "Kickboxer" right?

Ah! Forgot about "Dominant". "Great Oral Skills" fits with my work as well